The Marble's ball doesn't pop around and it is more secure than the Orbit's. It was fine later on, but I was still annoyed by the tendency of the ball to pop back and forth if the fingers are in front of the ball. The Orbit was much more sensitive than the Marble and seemed jittery at first. The Orbit and the Trackman Marble are very similar and I was expecting almost identical function between the two. The Marble was my main mouse until I bought the Orbit and it never has had even a slight issue with compatibility. The Marble worked the first time, perfectly, with or without the SetPoint software. The Trackman Marble was perfect in this regard. I continued to screw with it until I gave up and attached the PS/2 adapter and used it that way without problems. I installed the Kensington TrackballWorks software and the trackball actually stopped working. Windows refused to recognize the trackball, and I fiddled with the plug for a few minutes until it began to work. However the Orbit had many issues after I plugged it in. I will compare them in several categories to determine if one can prove superior to the other.īoth trackballs are USB devices, and both support PS/2 plugs with a simple adapter (the plug changer kind). ![]() Even the balls are the exact same size (The Marble's ball will work fine in the Orbit but not the other way around). They both have two main buttons (the Marble has two additional small ones which are mainly for forward-back web surfing, but can be reconfigured using Logitech SetPoint) and both are the cheapest trackballs offered by their manufacturer. Both are ambidextrous in design with the ball in front. The Logitech Trackman Marble and the Kensington Orbit are in direct competition as the entry-level $25-30 trackballs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |